Pumpkin Seed HQ |
Thursday, 18. December 2003
Auch wenn ich nicht mit allem ganz einverstanden bin was da steht. Das Essentielle ist richtig erklärt: There has been considerable FUD of late asserting that if a company inadvertently incorporates GPL code into its proprietary code, they can be forced to release their proprietary code under the GPL. This isn't new FUD. It's old FUD, but in some new mouths. The GPL is a License, Not a Contract, Which is Why the Sky Isn't Falling via /. |
Online for 8202 days
Last update: 6/8/11, 1:03 PM
status
Youre not logged in ... Login
recent updates
Pas(s)t! As some people asked
- last year July I pitched the tent of my...
by retrakker (6/7/11, 9:46 AM)
RoundBox Webmail If your workplace
or personal webmail sucks - try RoundBox.
by retrakker (10/7/09, 12:10 PM)
New CX Economy Seats Well,
I was forced to be mostly on OneWorld for the...
by retrakker (9/21/09, 1:32 AM)
Na Herr Doktor ... Zum
Glück darf ich mit meinem PhD in Deutschland (und nur...
by retrakker (8/23/09, 9:00 PM)
Towards a consistent Linux ABI
The Linux ABI Checker seems like a great tool. Ever...
by retrakker (8/21/09, 11:44 AM)
Built-In Slowification people don't realize
how hindering all these automatic and uncontrollable functions in devices...
by retrakker (8/20/09, 8:32 AM)
SIGPIPE 13 by Allan Odgaard
of TextMate While working on the successor to Textmate 1.5...
by retrakker (8/19/09, 9:02 PM)
|